Demand for House of Lords to overturn Boris decision on social care costs

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

They have warned the changes – which are to be scrutinised by Peers – will hit poorer people.

The Prime Minister is facing a bruising battle on the issue after narrowly pushing through his policy on Monday night, despite 19 Conservative MPs rebelling and dozens more abstaining.

Ministers were unable to say whether the change to the £86,000 threshold on care costs honoured an election pledge to guarantee no one would have to sell their home to pay for it.

Backbench Tory critics joined experts and Labour MPs in warning the move to count only individual payments towards the cap, and not local authority contributions, would cost less well-off recipients more in assets than the wealthy.

Former health secretary Jeremy Hunt believes the Government will end up performing another U-turn.

He said: “It makes it a harder package to sell to the whole country, which is why I hope very much that this is something Government will look at again before the next election.

Peers have been urged to ask MPs to think again.

Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: “The Government’s amendment may have been passed by the House of Commons but no doubt the House of Lords will fulfil its constitutional role and give it the intense scrutiny it needs.

“We hope Peers will vote to overturn it. No one disputes that the amendment waters down the Government’s plan for a cap on catastrophic care costs and protects only the better off.

“This is unfair and means the people most in need of protection against the risk of care bills wiping out their assets are least likely to receive it. Many of these people will have bought their council homes under the ‘right to buy’, an extraordinary situation for this group of ministers to have created.”

Baroness Finlay of Llandaff said the House of Lords would look at it “very, very carefully”.

The crossbencher, a professor of palliative medicine, said: “It may be we say to the Commons, ‘can you think again?’ Clearly there’s a lot of disquiet.”

Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, urged the Prime Minister to “go back to the drawing board”.

He added: “There is nothing in this flimsy plan to justify the national insurance hike next April.”

What is happening where you live? Find out by adding your postcode or visit InYourArea

Health Secretary Sajid Javid told the Commons treasury committee in a letter that he is not able to say how the changes will affect individuals and regions because an impact assessment will not be published until “early in the new year”.

Meanwhile, Mr Hunt led another Tory rebellion last night – with 18 MPs backing his Health and Care Bill amendment to introduce better workforce planning.

It was rejected by 280 votes to 219 – a majority of 61.

Source: Read Full Article